Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 18:56:06 GMT
Reds trade:
SP Mike Leake (9) $15.00 $16.00 $15.00 $18.00
Phillies trade:
RP Blake Parker (4) $1.80
Leake has actually been pitching really well but I just don’t have the cap space in the future to hold his contract. Parker is currently the closer in LAA so hopefully my team can actually get some saves.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
CIN / PHI
Jun 15, 2018 19:28:09 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 19:28:09 GMT
Accept
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
CIN / PHI
Jun 15, 2018 19:30:37 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 19:30:37 GMT
Yea
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 19:32:55 GMT
Not sure why you would want to take on that contract for Leake, but sure.
|
|
|
|
CIN / PHI
Jun 15, 2018 19:43:13 GMT
via mobile
Post by Tigers GM (Ryan) on Jun 15, 2018 19:43:13 GMT
Have fun with that contract.
Approve by me
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
CIN / PHI
Jun 15, 2018 19:43:34 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 19:43:34 GMT
Pass
|
|
|
|
CIN / PHI
Jun 15, 2018 19:45:58 GMT
via mobile
Post by Giants GM (Devon) on Jun 15, 2018 19:45:58 GMT
Approve.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 19:56:37 GMT
Approve
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
|
Post by DBacks GM (David) on Jun 15, 2018 20:10:33 GMT
Pass.
|
|
|
|
CIN / PHI
Jun 15, 2018 21:31:43 GMT
via mobile
Post by Marlins GM (Andrew) on Jun 15, 2018 21:31:43 GMT
I'm sorry guys. I don't understand this one. Dealing a current closer who's cost controlled for a bad starter who's locked in for $15M annually doesn't make sense to me without more context around why Philly's into it.
Veto.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pirates GM (Alex) on Jun 15, 2018 22:03:53 GMT
I've got to agree with the Marlins. Phillies provides no reasoning for why he wants to take on a mediocre pitcher who will take up more than 10% of his salary cap for the next four seasons when pitchers generally decline. Leake has an ERA above 4, WHIP near 1.3, and a K/9 below 6. Parker is a guy who has been pitching well in the bullpen recently and could have a closer role locked down.
Teams have to provide reasoning if they're going to take on such HUGE risks in salary. Otherwise, I'm just assuming they don't know what they're getting into and are getting ripped off by another team.
Veto
|
|
|
|
CIN / PHI
Jun 16, 2018 1:02:29 GMT
via mobile
Post by Astros GM (Travis) on Jun 16, 2018 1:02:29 GMT
Hate voting but there should absolutely be no vetoes on this one. Approve approve approve. Getting out of hand guys, cmon. “Save” the franchise? Gimme a break. Approve approve approve...
|
|
|
|
Post by Pirates GM (Alex) on Jun 16, 2018 3:37:38 GMT
Hate voting but there should absolutely be no vetoes on this one. Approve approve approve. Getting out of hand guys, cmon. “Save” the franchise? Gimme a break. Approve approve approve... So we should only veto when...? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
Post by Astros GM (Travis) on Jun 16, 2018 3:51:36 GMT
Hate voting but there should absolutely be no vetoes on this one. Approve approve approve. Getting out of hand guys, cmon. “Save” the franchise? Gimme a break. Approve approve approve... So we should only veto when...? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Obvious collusion, or a league altering trade. This is neither of them, or is it even close to either of them. Read the group chat, we had a long discussion about vetoing. |
|
|
|
Post by Blue Jays GM (Matt) on Jun 16, 2018 5:55:28 GMT
I'm not voting and am not accusing anyone of collusion but this trade needs more than "accept" from PHI bc it makes zero fucking sense
|
|
